Indiana Dog Bite Cases: Settlement vs. Trial

Dog bites can be a traumatic experience, and they happen more often than many people realize. In Indiana, like in other states, victims of dog bites may suffer from physical injuries, emotional distress, and financial hardships. These incidents can leave individuals feeling overwhelmed, unsure of what steps to take next, and anxious about their future. One of the key decisions they face is whether to pursue a settlement or go to trial in their dog bite case. Understanding the differences between these options can help individuals make informed decisions and potentially lead to a successful outcome.

The Impact of Dog Bite Injuries

Dog bite injuries can vary in severity, from minor scratches to life-threatening wounds. Many victims, especially children, may suffer from deep cuts, torn muscles, nerve damage, and even broken bones. In severe cases, victims might face permanent scarring or disfigurement. Apart from the physical injuries, the emotional toll of a dog bite can be significant. Fear of dogs, anxiety, and even post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are common after such an attack.

Medical treatment for dog bite injuries can be expensive, and victims may also have to deal with lost wages if they are unable to work while recovering. These financial burdens, combined with the emotional trauma, often lead victims to seek compensation. This compensation can cover medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, and other related expenses.

Understanding Indiana’s Dog Bite Laws

Indiana has specific laws that govern dog bite cases. A dog owner can be held liable if their dog bites someone, particularly if the owner was negligent in controlling the animal. However, there are some exceptions to this rule. For instance, if the victim provoked the dog or was trespassing on the owner’s property, the owner may not be held liable. It’s important for victims to understand these legal nuances when deciding how to proceed with their case.

Attorney Christopher Wyant is here to help you. 

With over 17 years of experience, Attorney Wyant has spent his entire legal career representing individuals who have been injured or killed as a result of the carelessness of others. With trial experience in over 20 jury trials, he has handled cases involving wrongful death and personal injury arising out of automobile crashes, premises liability, slips and falls, dog attacks, and civil rights violations.

 

The Role of Settlements in Dog Bite Cases

In many dog bite cases, both the victim and the dog owner may prefer to settle the case out of court. Settlements are often faster and less stressful than going to trial. When a case is settled, the victim and the dog owner (or their insurance company) agree on a certain amount of compensation without the need for a trial. This amount is meant to cover the victim’s medical expenses, lost wages, and other costs related to the dog bite.

Settlements can be beneficial for both parties. For the victim, a settlement provides certainty and avoids the unpredictability of a trial. It can also help the victim receive compensation more quickly, which is especially important if they need money to cover medical bills and other expenses right away. For the dog owner, settling the case can prevent the negative publicity that might come from a trial, and it can also avoid the risk of being ordered to pay a much larger amount if the case goes to trial and the jury rules in favor of the victim.

The Potential Drawbacks of Settlements

While settlements can offer a quicker resolution, they are not always the best option for every victim. In some cases, the compensation offered in a settlement may not fully cover the victim’s expenses and losses. Insurance companies, which often handle the financial side of dog bite cases, may try to offer a lower settlement amount to save money. Victims who accept a settlement may later realize that the amount was not enough to cover their long-term medical needs or ongoing emotional distress.

It’s important for victims to carefully consider any settlement offer before accepting it. Consulting with a lawyer can help ensure that the victim is being treated fairly and that the settlement offer is reasonable. Victims should not feel pressured to accept a settlement if they believe they deserve more compensation for their injuries.

My husband and I were involved in an auto accident. The driver that hit us was without a doubt at fault. In less than 2 days we were getting calls from the driver’s insurance company wanting us to accept 15% fault. The calls kept coming to try and push us into a settlement. We decided to get legal help and found Chris Wyant. Once Chris took over we felt a big load lifted. He is very knowledgeable, well prepared and makes everything so much easier to understand the process. Chris has a very diligent work ethic that gets results. We are so very grateful to have found Chris. We highly recommend Chris Wyant.”

- Kathaleen Boyce

Chris was awesome from the very first meeting. Very professional and knowledgeable. He knew what needed to be done and what he needed from us. He was exceptionally easy to work with and very patient with all of the questions we had. All we had to do was either call or email him with a question and he responded as quickly as he could. I couldn’t be happier with his services. I would definitely recommend his practice to anyone."

- Rita Bridge

God Bless Wyant Law. I can honestly say that Chris went to bat for me in such a huge way during such a trying time. He was very professional and upfront about every step he took. I would 100 percent recommend Wyant Law for your legal needs."

- Briana Shouse

Taking a Dog Bite Case to Trial

If a settlement cannot be reached, the case may proceed to trial. Going to trial can be a longer and more complicated process, but it may be necessary to pursue fair compensation.  During a trial, both sides present their arguments and evidence to a judge or jury. The court will then decide whether the dog owner is liable and, if so, how much compensation the victim should receive.

One of the benefits of going to trial is that the victim has the opportunity to tell their full story in court. The judge or jury can hear about the extent of the victim’s injuries, the emotional impact of the dog bite, and any financial difficulties the victim has faced as a result of the attack. This can lead to a more favorable outcome for the victim, especially if the court awards a larger amount of compensation than what was initially offered in settlement negotiations.

However, trials also come with risks. There is no guarantee that the court will rule in favor of the victim, and even if they do, the compensation awarded may be more or less than what was offered in settlement. Additionally, trials can be time-consuming, stressful, and expensive. Victims should carefully weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of going to trial before making a decision.

Factors That Influence the Decision

There are several factors that can influence whether a dog bite case is settled or goes to trial. One of the most important factors is the strength of the evidence. If the victim has strong evidence showing that the dog owner was negligent or that the dog has a history of aggressive behavior, they may be in a better position to negotiate a favorable settlement. On the other hand, if the evidence is less clear, the victim may need to go to trial to prove their case.

The severity of the victim’s injuries is another key factor. In cases where the injuries are relatively minor, a settlement may be more appropriate, as both sides may prefer a quicker resolution. However, in cases where the injuries are severe or life-changing, the victim may be more inclined to go to trial in order to pursue the maximum amount of compensation.

The willingness of both sides to negotiate is also an important consideration. If the dog owner or their insurance company is unwilling to offer a fair settlement, the victim may have no choice but to take the case to trial. On the other hand, if both sides are open to negotiation, a settlement may be reached that satisfies both parties.

Related Videos

The Importance of Legal Representation

Whether a dog bite case is settled or goes to trial, having legal representation is crucial. A lawyer can help the victim understand their legal rights, gather evidence, negotiate with the other party, and represent the victim in court if necessary. Without a lawyer, the victim may struggle to navigate the legal system and may not receive the compensation they deserve.

In Indiana, dog bite laws can be complex, and each case is unique. A lawyer can help the victim determine whether a settlement or trial is the best option based on the specifics of their case. They can also ensure that the victim is not taken advantage of by insurance companies or other parties involved in the case.

Dog bite cases in Indiana can be challenging, both legally and emotionally. Victims must decide whether to settle their case or go to trial, and this decision can have a significant impact on the outcome of their case. Settlements offer a quicker resolution and less stress, but they may not always provide full compensation. Trials, on the other hand, give victims the chance to present their case in court, but they come with risks and can take longer to resolve.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on the individual circumstances of the case, including the severity of the injuries, the strength of the evidence, and the willingness of both sides to negotiate. Having an experienced lawyer can make a world of difference in helping victims make the right choice and securing the compensation they deserve.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a dog bite incident in Indiana, it’s important to seek legal guidance. Wyant Law is here to help you navigate your case and fight for the compensation you deserve. Contact us today for a consultation and learn how we can assist you in pursuing justice.