A Guide to the Severity of Dog Bite Levels

Understanding the severity of dog bite levels is crucial in personal injury cases, as it directly impacts the legal strategies we employ and the potential compensation our clients can receive from a dog bite case in Indiana. One invaluable tool in this process is the Dunbar Dog Bite Scale.

In this blog post, we will explore the nuances of the Dunbar Dog Bite Scale, explain how each level is defined, and discuss how these classifications can influence the legal proceedings and outcomes of dog bite cases. This information is vital for victims to understand their rights and the possible implications of their injuries, as well as for dog owners to recognize the seriousness of their pet’s behavior.

Understanding the Dunbar Dog Bite Scale

When dealing with dog attacks, it is essential to accurately assess the severity of the dog bite levels. This not only helps in providing appropriate medical care but also plays a crucial role in legal and behavioral assessments. The Dunbar Dog Bite Scale, developed by veterinarian and animal behaviorist Dr. Ian Dunbar, is a standardized tool used to categorize the severity of dog bites. This scale helps in understanding the intent and danger posed by the dog during the incident, which can be pivotal in legal cases and in designing rehabilitation strategies for the dog.

What is the Dunbar Dog Bite Scale?

The Dunbar Dog Bite Scale is a numerical system used to rate the severity of bites inflicted by dogs. It ranges from Level 1 to Level 6, with each level describing the increasing severity and potential danger of the bite. This scale is widely used by veterinarians, behaviorists, trainers, and attorneys to assess and document dog bite incidents.

Dog Bite Levels Defined by the Dunbar Dog Bite Scale

Level 1: Air Snap or Near Miss

At this level, the dog’s teeth do not make contact with the skin. The dog may snap or lunge without actual contact, often as a warning. This level indicates that while the dog felt threatened or provoked, it chose not to bite.

Level 2: Skin Contact without Puncture

The dog’s teeth make contact with the skin but do not break the skin. This can include nips or bites where there is slight pressure against the skin. Often, these incidents result in marks on the skin from the dog’s teeth but no actual puncture or tearing.

Level 3: Shallow Puncture

This level involves one to four shallow punctures from a single bite with no puncture deeper than half the length of the dog’s canine teeth. There may also be some slight tearing or bruising around the wound. Level 3 bites show a more serious intent to harm but still lack the severe aggression of higher levels.

Level 4: Deep Puncture

This level indicates one to four deeper punctures from a single bite with at least one puncture deeper than half the length of the dog’s canine teeth. It may also include severe bruising around the wounds. A Level 4 bite suggests the dog applied strong biting pressure, which is more dangerous and indicative of a higher propensity for causing serious harm.

Level 5: Multiple-Bite Incident or Multiple Attack Bites

A Level 5 bite involves multiple bites with at least two Level 4 bites or multiple attack incidents. This level indicates a dog with less bite inhibition and a higher risk of causing severe injury. These cases often involve more aggressive behavior and require immediate behavioral intervention.

Level 6: Victim Death

The most severe level, where a bite results in the death of the victim. Level 6 bites are indicative of extremely aggressive behavior and pose significant safety risks to all potential victims around the dog.

Considerations for Indiana Attorneys

In Indiana, dog bite cases can be pursued under theories of negligence, strict liability, or under a “one bite rule,” depending on the circumstances. The specific dog bite levels of the Dunbar Scale can heavily influence the legal strategy, particularly in illustrating the dog’s vicious propensity and owner’s knowledge of such behavior. Accurate documentation and expert testimony regarding the bite level can be pivotal in these cases.

My husband and I were involved in an auto accident. The driver that hit us was without a doubt at fault. In less than 2 days we were getting calls from the driver’s insurance company wanting us to accept 15% fault. The calls kept coming to try and push us into a settlement. We decided to get legal help and found Chris Wyant. Once Chris took over we felt a big load lifted. He is very knowledgeable, well prepared and makes everything so much easier to understand the process. Chris has a very diligent work ethic that gets results. We are so very grateful to have found Chris. We highly recommend Chris Wyant.”

- Kathaleen Boyce

Chris was awesome from the very first meeting. Very professional and knowledgeable. He knew what needed to be done and what he needed from us. He was exceptionally easy to work with and very patient with all of the questions we had. All we had to do was either call or email him with a question and he responded as quickly as he could. I couldn’t be happier with his services. I would definitely recommend his practice to anyone."

- Rita Bridge

God Bless Wyant Law. I can honestly say that Chris went to bat for me in such a huge way during such a trying time. He was very professional and upfront about every step he took. I would 100 percent recommend Wyant Law for your legal needs."

- Briana Shouse

What is the One-Bite Rule?

The “one-bite rule” is a legal doctrine used in some states, including Indiana, that affects how dog bite cases are evaluated and litigated. Under this rule, a dog owner may not be held liable for the first bite or attack by their dog, assuming they had no prior knowledge of the dog’s vicious tendencies. Essentially, the rule implies that a dog gets “one free bite” before the owner can be considered negligent due to the dog’s behavior.

Exceptions to the One-Bite Rule

The one-bite rule may seem to provide dog owners with protection from liability after a first bite, but there are several notable exceptions. First, if it can be proven that the dog had previously exhibited aggressive behavior or engaged in threatening actions, even without biting anyone, the owner can still be held liable. Second, if the owner’s negligence played a role in the bite—such as failing to leash the dog in public or not securing their property—the one-bite rule may not apply, irrespective of the dog’s bite history. Additionally, some areas in Indiana have specific laws imposing strict liability on dog owners for any injuries or damages caused by their dogs, thus circumventing the one-bite rule. Lastly, if a dog bites someone while trespassing on another’s property, the owner may be liable for damages without the protection of the one-bite rule.

Attorney Christopher Wyant is here to help you. 

With over 17 years of experience, Attorney Wyant has spent his entire legal career representing individuals who have been injured or killed as a result of the carelessness of others. With trial experience in over 20 jury trials, he has handled cases involving wrongful death and personal injury arising out of automobile crashes, premises liability, slips and falls, dog attacks, and civil rights violations.

 

Impact of the One-Bite Rule on Personal Injury Lawsuits

The one-bite rule plays a pivotal role in shaping how personal injury lawsuits, particularly those involving dog bites, are managed in Indiana. A significant aspect of these cases hinges on proving whether the dog owner had prior knowledge of their pet’s aggressive tendencies. This often requires substantial evidence, such as previous complaints about the dog, past incidents of aggression, or testimonies from witnesses who observed the dog’s behavior.

For victims, overcoming the one-bite rule necessitates presenting a compelling case that clearly demonstrates the owner’s prior awareness of the dog’s dangerous nature or their negligence in controlling the animal. Conversely, dog owners may defend against such claims by proving there was no previous aggressive behavior exhibited by their dog or by showing they adhered to reasonable care standards.

The application of the one-bite rule also impacts settlements and damages. If the rule applies, the victim’s ability to recover damages might be limited unless exceptions to the rule are proven. This reality influences both negotiations and the potential outcomes of litigation.

For anyone involved in a dog bite incident in Indiana, understanding the implications of the one-bite rule is essential. Victims should seek legal counsel to help navigate the rule’s complexities and gather the necessary evidence to build a strong case. Dog owners, on the other hand, should be aware of their responsibilities and the potential for liability, even from a first bite, under certain circumstances. Ultimately, preventive measures and responsible pet ownership are the best ways to avoid such incidents and the ensuing legal complications.

Related Videos

Emotional Support Animals and Liability in Indiana Dog Bite Incidents

Emotional support animals play an important role in the lives of many individuals, offering comfort and companionship to those who need it. In Indiana, as in many other states, emotional support animals (ESAs) are protected under certain laws, ensuring that people with emotional or mental health conditions can benefit from their companionship. However, when these animals are involved in incidents such as dog bites, questions about liability can arise. Who is responsible when an emotional support animal causes harm to another person? Understanding the laws surrounding ESAs and dog bite liability in Indiana is crucial for both animal owners and potential victims.

Understanding Emotional Support Animals in Indiana

Emotional support animals are different from service animals. While service animals are trained to perform specific tasks for individuals with disabilities, emotional support animals provide comfort and emotional stability to those suffering from mental or emotional health conditions. This distinction is important when it comes to legal protections and liability. In Indiana, emotional support animals are not granted the same privileges as service animals, meaning they may not have the same rights to enter public spaces or other areas where pets are typically not allowed. However, they do enjoy certain protections under federal laws such as the Fair Housing Act, which allows individuals to keep their emotional support animals in housing that might otherwise prohibit pets.

Despite these protections, emotional support animals are still animals, and like all animals, they can pose risks, including the potential to bite or harm others. Understanding the liability surrounding emotional support animals in the case of a dog bite is essential for both ESA owners and those who may come into contact with these animals.

Liability in Dog Bite Cases Involving Emotional Support Animals

In Indiana, dog bite liability is governed by a combination of state laws and legal precedents. The state operates under what is known as a “strict liability” rule in certain situations, meaning that dog owners can be held liable for injuries their dog causes, even if the dog has never shown aggression before. This is especially true for cases where a person is bitten by a dog while lawfully on the owner’s property, such as a postal worker or utility worker.

When it comes to emotional support animals, the rules of liability remain largely the same as with any other dog. If an ESA bites or attacks someone, the owner can be held liable for any damages or injuries resulting from the incident. However, there are nuances in how liability is determined, especially if the animal’s role as an emotional support companion is considered.

In cases involving emotional support animals, the owner’s responsibility to ensure that their animal does not pose a danger to others is still paramount. Just because an animal serves an emotional purpose does not exempt the owner from legal responsibility if the animal bites someone. Courts will typically evaluate the circumstances of the bite, including whether the animal had a history of aggression, whether the owner took proper precautions to prevent the bite, and the actions of the victim at the time of the incident.

The Role of Negligence in Dog Bite Cases

Negligence is often a key factor in dog bite cases involving emotional support animals. In Indiana, an owner may be found negligent if they failed to exercise reasonable care in controlling their dog or in preventing the dog from biting someone. For instance, if an emotional support animal has shown signs of aggression in the past and the owner failed to take steps to restrain the animal or warn others, this could be considered negligence.

Additionally, owners of emotional support animals are expected to follow local laws and ordinances regarding pet ownership. This includes keeping the animal on a leash when in public or ensuring that the animal is properly secured on private property. Failure to adhere to these regulations can further bolster a claim of negligence in the event of a dog bite.

It’s also important to note that in Indiana, comparative fault rules may come into play. This means that if the victim of the dog bite was partially responsible for the incident—for example, if they provoked the dog—the amount of compensation they can recover may be reduced based on their level of fault. However, even if the victim is found to be partially at fault, the owner of the emotional support animal can still be held liable for their portion of the blame.

Legal Protections for Emotional Support Animal Owners

While emotional support animal owners can be held liable for dog bites, there are also certain legal protections available to them under Indiana law. One of the most common defenses raised in dog bite cases is that the victim was trespassing or otherwise unlawfully on the owner’s property at the time of the bite. Indiana law generally protects dog owners from liability in cases where the victim was not lawfully on the property, although this defense may not apply in every case.

Another defense often raised is that the victim provoked the animal, leading to the bite. If the owner can prove that the victim’s actions directly caused the animal to react aggressively, this can limit or eliminate the owner’s liability. However, proving provocation can be challenging, as it often relies on witness testimony and other forms of evidence.

For emotional support animal owners, it is also important to understand that their animal’s role as a companion does not necessarily provide additional legal protection in a dog bite case. While emotional support animals are recognized for their important role in providing comfort and companionship, they are still subject to the same liability rules as any other pet. As such, owners must take the necessary precautions to ensure that their emotional support animal does not pose a danger to others.

Preventing Dog Bite Incidents Involving Emotional Support Animals

For emotional support animal owners, the best way to avoid liability in a dog bite case is to take proactive steps to prevent incidents from occurring in the first place. This includes training the animal to be obedient and well-behaved, particularly around strangers. While emotional support animals are not required to undergo the same level of training as service animals, basic obedience training can go a long way in preventing dangerous situations.

Owners should also be mindful of their animal’s temperament and take appropriate action if the animal shows signs of aggression. For example, if an emotional support dog becomes anxious or agitated in crowded or unfamiliar environments, the owner should avoid placing the dog in those situations. Similarly, if the animal has a history of biting or aggression, the owner should take extra precautions, such as using a muzzle or ensuring that the dog is always securely restrained.

In public settings, emotional support animal owners should adhere to all local leash laws and regulations, keeping their dog under control at all times. Even in situations where the dog may not appear to be a threat, it is the owner’s responsibility to prevent the dog from becoming a danger to others.

For victims of dog bite incidents involving emotional support animals, understanding the laws surrounding liability is crucial. If you have been injured by an emotional support animal in Indiana, it is important to seek legal guidance to determine your rights and options for pursuing compensation. A qualified attorney can help you navigate the complexities of Indiana’s dog bite laws and work to secure the compensation you deserve for your injuries.

Legal Rights of Dog Owners in Indiana: What You Should Know

Leash Laws

Indiana has specific leash laws in place to ensure the safety of both dogs and the community. In most cases, dogs must be kept on a leash when in public places. This means that when you take your dog for a walk in a city park, along the Monon Trail, or even just down the sidewalk, your pup should be on a leash. However, there are exceptions. Some parks and designated areas allow dogs to be off-leash, but be sure to research these locations and follow any posted rules.

Licensing and Registration

In Indiana, dog owners are required to register their pets. This helps to ensure that dogs are up-to-date on vaccinations, which is crucial for public health. Registration fees can vary, so be sure to check with the local animal control agency or city website for current rates and registration requirements.

Dog Bites and Liability

It’s essential to keep your dog under control and to take proper precautions to prevent accidents and injuries. Homeowner’s or renter’s insurance often covers liability for dog bites, but it’s crucial to check your policy and make sure you have adequate coverage.

Noise Ordinances

Excessive barking can be a nuisance to neighbors and may lead to complaints. Indiana has noise ordinances in place, and you may be subject to fines if your dog’s barking is deemed disruptive to the community. It’s your responsibility to address and manage your dog’s behavior to ensure it doesn’t become a recurring issue.

Breed-Specific Legislation

While Indiana does not have a statewide ban on specific dog breeds, some cities and municipalities within the state may have their own breed-specific legislation. It’s essential to check your local ordinances to see if any breed restrictions or regulations apply to your area. Pit bulls, Rottweilers, and other breeds are sometimes targeted by such laws.

Responsible Ownership

Being a responsible dog owner goes beyond understanding the legal requirements. It also means providing proper care for your pet. This includes regular veterinary care, adequate food and water, shelter, and socialization. Make sure to pick up after your dog when in public areas and keep them under control at all times.

Reporting Animal Cruelty

If you suspect that someone is abusing or neglecting their dog, it’s essential to report it to the proper authorities. In Indiana, you can contact the Animal Care Services (ACS) at (317) 327-1397 to report any concerns. Animal cruelty is taken seriously, and it’s everyone’s responsibility to protect our furry friends.

Dog-Friendly Establishments

Indiana has a growing number of dog-friendly businesses, including restaurants, breweries, and shops. However, always check the specific policies of these establishments before bringing your dog. Many require well-behaved and leashed pets, while some may even have designated dog-friendly areas.

The Role of Trespassing and Provocation in Dog Bite Cases

Indiana law also considers the circumstances under which the dog bite occurred, particularly focusing on whether the victim was trespassing or provoking the dog at the time of the attack. If a victim was unlawfully on the owner’s property or intentionally provoking the dog, it may impact their ability to claim compensation. However, exceptions exist, especially for young children who may not fully understand the consequences of their actions. Demonstrating that the victim was lawfully present and not engaging in provocative behavior is essential for a successful claim. Gathering evidence such as witness statements and surveillance footage can help establish the context of the incident.

Medical Documentation and Its Importance

Medical documentation plays a crucial role in dog bite cases, as it provides concrete evidence of the injuries sustained and the associated costs. Victims should seek immediate medical attention following a dog bite and ensure that all injuries are thoroughly documented. Medical records detailing the nature and extent of the injuries, treatment plans, and long-term prognosis are vital for establishing the severity of the bite. Additionally, keeping records of medical bills, rehabilitation costs, and any other related expenses can support the claim for compensation. Comprehensive medical documentation not only validates the victim’s injuries but also quantifies the financial impact of the incident.

Gathering Witness Testimonies and Evidence

Witness testimonies and other forms of evidence are indispensable in dog bite cases. Eyewitness accounts can provide valuable insights into the circumstances of the bite, the behavior of the dog, and the actions of both the owner and the victim. Collecting statements from individuals who were present at the time of the incident or who have knowledge of the dog’s behavior can substantiate the claim. Photographs of the injuries, the location of the bite, and any visible signs of negligence, such as broken fences or lack of warning signs, can further bolster the case. Detailed and corroborated evidence is essential for proving liability and securing compensation.

The Long-Term Impact of Dog Bite Injuries

Dog bites can have long-lasting physical and psychological effects on victims. Beyond the immediate medical treatment, victims may require ongoing therapy, reconstructive surgeries, and psychological counseling to address trauma. Understanding the long-term impact of these injuries is essential for accurately assessing compensation. Victims should consider not only the current medical expenses but also future costs related to rehabilitation, lost earning capacity, and emotional distress. Comprehensive documentation of these long-term impacts can support a more substantial compensation claim and ensure that victims are adequately compensated for their suffering.

Time Limits for Filing Dog Bite Claims in Indiana

Indiana imposes a statute of limitations on dog bite claims, which is the timeframe within which a victim must file their lawsuit. In Indiana, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including dog bites, is generally two years from the date of the incident. Failing to file within this period can result in the loss of the right to pursue compensation. Victims should act promptly to ensure that they meet all legal deadlines and preserve their ability to seek justice. Legal representation can help manage these timelines and ensure that all necessary documentation is filed in a timely manner.

Emotional and Psychological Support for Dog Bite Victims

The trauma of a dog bite extends beyond physical injuries, often leaving victims with lasting emotional and psychological scars. Victims may experience anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a result of the attack. Seeking professional psychological support is crucial for addressing these issues and aiding in the recovery process. Documenting the psychological impact of the bite can also support claims for compensation related to emotional distress. Understanding the full scope of the impact, both physical and emotional, is essential for ensuring that victims receive comprehensive compensation for their suffering.

Taking a Dog Bite Case to Trial

If a settlement cannot be reached, the case may proceed to trial. Going to trial can be a longer and more complicated process, but it may be necessary to pursue fair compensation.  During a trial, both sides present their arguments and evidence to a judge or jury. The court will then decide whether the dog owner is liable and, if so, how much compensation the victim should receive.

One of the benefits of going to trial is that the victim has the opportunity to tell their full story in court. The judge or jury can hear about the extent of the victim’s injuries, the emotional impact of the dog bite, and any financial difficulties the victim has faced as a result of the attack. This can lead to a more favorable outcome for the victim, especially if the court awards a larger amount of compensation than what was initially offered in settlement negotiations.

However, trials also come with risks. There is no guarantee that the court will rule in favor of the victim, and even if they do, the compensation awarded may be more or less than what was offered in settlement. Additionally, trials can be time-consuming, stressful, and expensive. Victims should carefully weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of going to trial before making a decision.

Factors That Influence the Decision

There are several factors that can influence whether a dog bite case is settled or goes to trial. One of the most important factors is the strength of the evidence. If the victim has strong evidence showing that the dog owner was negligent or that the dog has a history of aggressive behavior, they may be in a better position to negotiate a favorable settlement. On the other hand, if the evidence is less clear, the victim may need to go to trial to prove their case.

The severity of the victim’s injuries is another key factor. In cases where the injuries are relatively minor, a settlement may be more appropriate, as both sides may prefer a quicker resolution. However, in cases where the injuries are severe or life-changing, the victim may be more inclined to go to trial in order to pursue the maximum amount of compensation.

The willingness of both sides to negotiate is also an important consideration. If the dog owner or their insurance company is unwilling to offer a fair settlement, the victim may have no choice but to take the case to trial. On the other hand, if both sides are open to negotiation, a settlement may be reached that satisfies both parties.

The Role of Settlements in Dog Bite Cases

In many dog bite cases, both the victim and the dog owner may prefer to settle the case out of court. Settlements are often faster and less stressful than going to trial. When a case is settled, the victim and the dog owner (or their insurance company) agree on a certain amount of compensation without the need for a trial. This amount is meant to cover the victim’s medical expenses, lost wages, and other costs related to the dog bite.

Settlements can be beneficial for both parties. For the victim, a settlement provides certainty and avoids the unpredictability of a trial. It can also help the victim receive compensation more quickly, which is especially important if they need money to cover medical bills and other expenses right away. For the dog owner, settling the case can prevent the negative publicity that might come from a trial, and it can also avoid the risk of being ordered to pay a much larger amount if the case goes to trial and the jury rules in favor of the victim.

The Potential Drawbacks of Settlements

While settlements can offer a quicker resolution, they are not always the best option for every victim. In some cases, the compensation offered in a settlement may not fully cover the victim’s expenses and losses. Insurance companies, which often handle the financial side of dog bite cases, may try to offer a lower settlement amount to save money. Victims who accept a settlement may later realize that the amount was not enough to cover their long-term medical needs or ongoing emotional distress.

It’s important for victims to carefully consider any settlement offer before accepting it. Consulting with a lawyer can help ensure that the victim is being treated fairly and that the settlement offer is reasonable. Victims should not feel pressured to accept a settlement if they believe they deserve more compensation for their injuries.

Compensation for Victims of Dog Bites and Animal Attacks

Victims of dog bites and animal attacks in Indiana may be entitled to various forms of compensation, depending on the severity of their injuries and the circumstances of the attack. Compensation can cover a wide range of damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress.

Medical expenses are often a significant component of compensation claims. Dog bites can result in severe injuries, such as deep lacerations, puncture wounds, infections, and nerve damage. Victims may require emergency medical treatment, surgery, and ongoing rehabilitation. In some cases, they may also need psychological counseling to address the emotional trauma associated with the attack.

Lost wages can also be a major factor in compensation claims. Victims may be unable to work for an extended period due to their injuries, leading to a loss of income. In cases where the victim suffers permanent disability or disfigurement, they may be entitled to compensation for future lost earnings and diminished earning capacity.

Pain and suffering encompass the physical pain and emotional distress experienced by the victim as a result of the attack. This can include chronic pain, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Quantifying pain and suffering is challenging, as it involves subjective experiences that vary from person to person. Courts often consider the severity and duration of the victim’s suffering, as well as the impact on their overall quality of life.

The Role of Insurance in Dog Bite Cases

Insurance plays a crucial role in dog bite cases, as many homeowners’ and renters’ insurance policies provide coverage for liability arising from dog attacks. This can include coverage for medical expenses, legal fees, and damages awarded to the victim. However, insurance companies often attempt to minimize their payouts, making it essential for victims to have strong legal representation to ensure they receive fair compensation.

At Wyant Law, we understand the tactics used by insurance companies to deny or reduce claims. We work diligently to negotiate with insurers on behalf of our clients and, if necessary, litigate to secure the compensation they deserve. Our goal is to alleviate the financial burden on victims and help them focus on their recovery.

Your Indiana Personal Injury Attorneys

Understanding the severity of dog bite levels is not only crucial for medical treatment but also for legal representation. Whether the bite was a minor snap without skin contact or a severe, multi-bite attack, the dog bite levels of the Dunbar Scale provides essential information that can help shape the legal strategy and potentially affect the outcome of a personal injury claim.

At Wyant Law, we are dedicated to providing legal guidance and support to victims of dog bites. Our team understands the physical, emotional, and financial toll that a dog bite can impose on individuals and their families. We are well-versed in the nuances of dog bite laws and are committed to advocating for the rights and well-being of our clients.

If you or a loved one has been a victim of a dog bite, we encourage you to reach out to us. Our experienced attorneys can evaluate your case, guide you through the complexities of the legal process, and help you secure the compensation you deserve for your injuries and suffering. Contact Wyant Law today to schedule a consultation and take the first step towards recovery and justice.